Skip to main content

Jury Sides the Defendant in the Second Bard IVC Filter Trial

Jury Sides the Defendant in the Second Bard IVC Filter Trial

Jury Sides the Defendant in  the Second Bard IVC Filter Trial

Introduction

The second bellwether trial for C.R. Bard's Eclipse IVC Filter ended in the defendant's favor on June 1, 2018, as the Arizona jury found that adequate warning was provided to doctors regarding the possible adverse effects of the IVC filter.

An Inferior vena cava filter (IVC filter), earlier popularly known as Greenfield filter, is a medical device implanted in the inferior vena cava just below the kidneys to capture blood clots, preventing them from reaching the heart and lungs, thereby, safeguarding against life-threatening pulmonary emboli (PE). IVC filters were cleared for use through the 510(k) process since 1976 however, in 2010 the FDA issued a device safety communication after reviewing more than 900 adverse events related to the devices over a period of five years C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, Bard) and Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical LLC, and William Cook Europe ApS (collectively, Cook) are the main manufacturers of retrievable IVC filters. Other manufacturers include Argon Medical Devices, Cordis Corporation, Rex Medical, Johnson & Johnson, ALN, B. Braun Medical, and Rafael Medical.

The verdict was given out in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona presided over by Judge David G. Campbell. The plaintiff was implanted with Bard IVC Eclipse Filter in 2010 to treat recurrent deep vein thrombosis and five years later she developed arm pain and headaches.

On further probe, it was discovered that the filter broke and one of the pieces blocked her right pulmonary artery, which could not be removed by surgeons.

The first bellwether against C.R.Bard concluded with $3.6 million as compensatory and punitive damages to the plaintiff. There are more than 3,800 IVC Filter lawsuits against Bard for not warning about the defective design of the filter. The cases were centralized in 2015 to coordinate the pre-trial proceedings under MDL 2641 (in re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation) before U.S. District Judge David Campbell.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Lawyers to Meet Nov. 5 for Talcum Powder Trial Prep

Categories: Talcum

As the first federal talcum powder bellwether trial approaches, both plaintiffs and defendants have finalized their legal teams and are preparing for a key pretrial conference scheduled for early November.

The upcoming proceedings mark a…

2025 Update: What to Know About PPI Lawsuit Settlements & Payout Dates

Categories: Settlements

Last updated on Oct 27, 2025.

The mass tort litigation involving proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs — such as Nexium, Prilosec, Prevacid and Protonix — is entering a pivotal phase in

New Front Emerges in Fight Against Synthetic Opioids

Categories: Opioids

The U.S. opioid crisis has already claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, with fentanyl standing out as one of the deadliest substances. Now the leading cause of death among Americans aged 18 to 44, fentanyl has become synonymous with overdose…

⏳ Save 80+ Hours Monthly — Try Medical Records Review for FREE!                     
💼 Delivered in 7 Days. No AI. No Contracts.
Handled by Certified Doctors — 100% Compliant.

Only 5 Free Slot remain — Offer Ends Soon!