Skip to main content

Plaintiff In First Zantac Lawsuit To Withdraw The Case

Plaintiff In First Zantac Lawsuit To Withdraw The Case

Plaintiff In First Zantac Lawsuit To Withdraw The Case

Introduction

According to the plaintiff's lawyer and the drugmakers identified as defendants in the first lawsuit involving the heartburn medication Zantac that is set to go to trial, the plaintiff has decided to withdraw the case.

The decision comes days after investors worry about hundreds of lawsuits alleging the medicine, which U.S. authorities took from the market in 2020, caused cancer, and hurt shares of GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Sanofi SA, Pfizer Inc, and Haleon Plc.

In Illinois state court, the first trial in one of those cases was slated to start the following Monday. The complainant claimed that using over-the-counter Zantac caused him to acquire esophageal cancer.

An attorney representing Bayer stated that although her client was unable to continue due to personal health concerns, he was still entitled to resubmit his case within a year.

Both defendants in the lawsuit, GSK and Boehringer Ingelheim, expressed satisfaction that it had been dismissed and that Zantac was safe based on the available scientific data.

Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Sanofi have all offered Zantac at various periods since it was first promoted by a competitor of GSK. Haleon includes consumer health assets that were once owned by GSK and Pfizer and were spun off as an independent business last month.

The 2020 recall came after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration looked into whether the primary ingredient in Zantac, ranitidine, raises blood levels of the potentially cancer-causing substance N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) among users.

A hearing about the admissibility of expert testimony in future trials is planned for September 20 in federal court in West Palm Beach, Florida, where around 2,000 claims have been consolidated.

The first federal court proceedings are scheduled to begin sometime in next year, although the case may be effectively resolved earlier if the corporations receive a relatively favorable verdict on the evidence.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Court Approves $700M Opioid Settlement for Acute Hospitals

Categories: Opioids

A federal court has approved a $700 million class-action settlement that will compensate over 1,000 acute care hospitals for costs related to the opioid crisis.

The settlement consolidates four separate agreements involving major drug…

Philips Settles CPAP Lawsuits Over Toxic Foam for $1.1B

Philips has been embroiled in legal battles following the recall of millions of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices due to toxic foam degradation.

The breakdown of the foam in these machines may release harmful chemicals, raising serious…

Texas Trial to Decide J&J’s $10B Talcum Powder Settlement

Categories: Talcum

A high-stakes trial in Texas will determine whether Johnson & Johnson (J&J) can resolve tens of thousands of talcum powder cancer lawsuits through a…

🎁 March VIP Medical Record Review Offer – Get 300 Pages Free!         
Includes a Free Life Care Plan Report + 10% Off Future Reviews!

Only 15 Firms Accepted.