Skip to main content

Purdue Blamed Over Opioid Crisis In SF By Other Defendants

Purdue Blamed Over Opioid Crisis In SF By Other Defendants

Purdue Blamed Over Opioid Crisis In SF By Other Defendants

Introduction

The remaining defendants of the landmark opioid trial in San Francisco have denied all the wrongdoings in the country's opioid epidemic that resulted in the deaths of nearly half a million people.

Walgreens, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, AbbVie Inc's Allergan unit and drug distributor Anda Inc, which is owned by Teva, are the defendants in the lawsuit who face allegations of creating public nuisance and fueling opioid crisis accross the nation. But the lawyers representing the defendants argued that they are not to be blamed as aggressive marketing tactics from Oxycontin inventor Purdue Pharma increased the opioid sales.

The attorneys representing the drug companies said that the aggressive and misleading marketing of opioids is approved by the FDA. The company even claimed that opioids made by their clients accounted for a small fraction of the opiates sold in San Francisco.

The attorneys indicated that Teva's market share in San Francisco's opioid sales accounted for just 0.09% and 0.72% for Allergan, whereas Oxycontin's sales in San Francisco between 2008 and 2017 accounted for more than half of the prescription opioids legally.

San Francisco argued in the opening statement of the lawsuit that the pharmacists were forced by the Walgreens corporate management to fill prescriptions quickly. The city even blamed Purdue pharma of funding advocacy groups for convincing regulators and policy makers to highlight that chronic pain was a serious problem in society which needs to be treated using painkillers. The accusations even include that Purdue used a huge number of sales representatives who met the doctors personally to boost the sales of Oxycontin by telling that it is non addictive.

Purdue filed for bankruptcy in 2020 to settle thousands of lawsuits against it, which also included the lawsuit from San Francisco. Johnson & Johnson and McKesson are the other two big names who settled the claims with the city.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Court Approves $700M Opioid Settlement for Acute Hospitals

Categories: Opioids

A federal court has approved a $700 million class-action settlement that will compensate over 1,000 acute care hospitals for costs related to the opioid crisis.

The settlement consolidates four separate agreements involving major drug…

Philips Settles CPAP Lawsuits Over Toxic Foam for $1.1B

Philips has been embroiled in legal battles following the recall of millions of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices due to toxic foam degradation.

The breakdown of the foam in these machines may release harmful chemicals, raising serious…

Texas Trial to Decide J&J’s $10B Talcum Powder Settlement

Categories: Talcum

A high-stakes trial in Texas will determine whether Johnson & Johnson (J&J) can resolve tens of thousands of talcum powder cancer lawsuits through a…

🎁 March VIP Medical Record Review Offer – Get 300 Pages Free!         
Includes a Free Life Care Plan Report + 10% Off Future Reviews!

Only 15 Firms Accepted.