Skip to main content

Summary Judgment For the 2nd Cook IVC Filter Bellwether Case

Summary Judgment For the 2nd Cook IVC Filter Bellwether Case

Summary Judgment For the 2nd Cook IVC Filter Bellwether Case

Introduction

In an order issued on December 5, Judge Richard L. Young of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment to Cook Medical Inc. on failure-to-warn claims in an IVC filter bellwether case filed by a Georgia resident.

The federal judge found that the plaintiff failed to prove that the device maker was at fault for not warning her surgeon about the risks of using the Cook Celect IVC filter. As per Judge Young, the evidence presented at the trial did not indicate that her surgeon relied solely on the device's instructions while treating her. Judge Young quoted, "The undisputed evidence reflects that the doctor (1) did not rely on the Celect 4 IVC filter’s [instructions for use], (2) already knew at the time of plaintiff’s implant about all of the complications plaintiff experienced, and (3) would not have treated plaintiff any differently even knowing now the complications that she actually suffered. Therefore, the plaintiff is unable, as a matter of law, to establish causation in her strict liability and negligent failure to warn claims.”

In 2014, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Cook claiming strict liability and negligent failure to warn, strict liability and negligent design defect, negligent manufacturing, negligence per se, breach of warranty, loss of consortium, and punitive damages. Cook sought a summary judgment to have the case dismissed. The plaintiff failed to respond to the company's bid to strike off the breach of warranty, negligent manufacturing, and loss of consortium claims, which was dismissed eventually by Judge Young. Now, the lawsuit comprises of only strict liability, negligent design defect, and negligence per se claims. This is the second IVC filter bellwether case to go for trial after a similar case was dismissed over the statute of limitation expiry in March 2018.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Court Approves $700M Opioid Settlement for Acute Hospitals

Categories: Opioids

A federal court has approved a $700 million class-action settlement that will compensate over 1,000 acute care hospitals for costs related to the opioid crisis.

The settlement consolidates four separate agreements involving major drug…

Philips Settles CPAP Lawsuits Over Toxic Foam for $1.1B

Philips has been embroiled in legal battles following the recall of millions of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices due to toxic foam degradation.

The breakdown of the foam in these machines may release harmful chemicals, raising serious…

Texas Trial to Decide J&J’s $10B Talcum Powder Settlement

Categories: Talcum

A high-stakes trial in Texas will determine whether Johnson & Johnson (J&J) can resolve tens of thousands of talcum powder cancer lawsuits through a…

🎁 March VIP Medical Record Review Offer – Get 300 Pages Free!         
Includes a Free Life Care Plan Report + 10% Off Future Reviews!

Only 15 Firms Accepted.