Skip to main content

U.S. Judge Overturns Purdue Pharma's Ch.11 Confirmation

U.S. Judge Overturns Purdue Pharma's Ch.11 Confirmation

U.S. Judge Overturns Purdue Pharma's Ch.11 Confirmation

Introduction

Purdue Pharma's Chapter 11 confirmation that would have shielded its owners, the members of the Sackler family from opioid litigations and penalties, has been overturned by a federal judge.

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon ruled in a 142-page opinion that the New York bankruptcy court did not have the right to approve the $4.5 billion bankruptcy settlement that would protect the Sacklers from future opioid litigations.

Purdue's chairman responded to the ruling by stating that the company would appeal the decision, and the court's judgment would not affect the operations of the company's stability and ability to produce safe and effective medications to the consumers.

The Sacklers had even insisted on guaranteed legal protections in exchange for a $4.5 billion settlement that it will pay to resolve widespread opioid litigation.

Attorney General Merrick Garland supported the ruling as he feels the bankruptcy court does not have the right to deprive the opioid victims of their rights of suing the company that caused the opioid crisis. Even the Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson also praised the decision, who had earlier opposed Purdue's reorganization.

Ferguson even stated that justice would be the same for both ordinary Americans and billionaires and added that he is ready to fight the suit in the Supreme court if necessary.

The drugmaker's reorganization plan has been supported by 95% of the creditors, whereas eight states, Washington, D.C., Seattle and more than 2,600 personal injury claimants have opposed the move.

In September 2019, Purdue filed for bankruptcy considering the 3,000 lawsuits it faced and the opioid crisis that claimed 500,000 lives since 1999. The lawsuits allege that the company downplayed the addiction and overdose risks of opioids and aggressively marketed it for making profits. The company and the family members have denied all the allegations against them.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Supreme Court Upholds Flavored Vape Ban

Categories: E-Cigarette: JUUL

The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously upheld a decision by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to block the sale and marketing of certain flavored e-cigarette products.

The ruling supports the FDA’s authority to regulate tobacco…

Judge Rejects JnJ's $10B Talc Lawsuit Settlement

Categories: Talcum

Johnson & Johnson's shares fell more than 5% after a U.S. bankruptcy judge rejected its $10 billion settlement proposal aimed at resolving over 60,000 lawsuits. 

These lawsuits allege that the company’s…

Tepezza Hearing Loss MDL: Bellwether Trials Set for 2026

Categories: Tepezza

A U.S. District Judge overseeing Tepezza hearing damage lawsuits nationwide has scheduled four bellwether trials for 2026. These trials are intended to help both parties assess how juries may respond to the evidence and testimonies that could be…

🛠️ You Have Unfinished Work. We’ll Finish It — Free Trial.            
Free Trial + 25% Off All DLs & Med Review Case Backlog!

Only 12 Firms Can Join – First Come, First Served