Skip to main content

Valsartan Recall Lawsuit Set for Trial

Valsartan Recall Lawsuit Set for Trial

Valsartan Recall Lawsuit Set for Trial

Introduction

Years after the initiation of Valsartan recalls, the U.S. District Judge overseeing lawsuits filed by individuals harmed by tainted versions of the blood pressure drug has been approved the first case to proceed to trial.

Over 1,200 valsartan recall lawsuits have been lodged against manufacturers and distributors, alleging that alterations to the generic drug manufacturing process resulted in the distribution of pills containing elevated levels of harmful chemicals like N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), known to elevate the risk of various cancers and other injuries.

Centralizing the litigation before a U.S. District Judge in the District of New Jersey since 2019, the parties have been preparing for early "bellwether" trials to assess how juries might respond to consistent evidence and testimony across numerous claims. However, given the prolonged latency period for certain cancers associated with NDMA in valsartan, new lawsuits continue to emerge.

Originally slated to commence on March 18, the first valsartan trial was postponed by a text order entered on the docket on March 8, without a subsequent explanation or new trial date being established. Subsequently, on March 26, the Judge denied the manufacturers' motion for summary judgment in the trial case, permitting claims for breach of express warranty, consumer protection laws, and fraud to proceed. Additionally, the Judge declined to preclude plaintiffs from seeking punitive damages against the manufacturers and distributors, potentially resulting in significantly higher damages to hold the manufacturers accountable for disregarding consumer health and safety.

Should the parties fail to make headway toward resolving the litigation or implementing a Valsartan recall settlements program, it is anticipated that the Judge will proceed with a series of "bellwether" trials. Following this, he may consider remanding numerous claims back to U.S. District Courts across the nation for separate trial dates in the future.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Court Approves $700M Opioid Settlement for Acute Hospitals

Categories: Opioids

A federal court has approved a $700 million class-action settlement that will compensate over 1,000 acute care hospitals for costs related to the opioid crisis.

The settlement consolidates four separate agreements involving major drug…

Philips Settles CPAP Lawsuits Over Toxic Foam for $1.1B

Philips has been embroiled in legal battles following the recall of millions of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices due to toxic foam degradation.

The breakdown of the foam in these machines may release harmful chemicals, raising serious…

Texas Trial to Decide J&J’s $10B Talcum Powder Settlement

Categories: Talcum

A high-stakes trial in Texas will determine whether Johnson & Johnson (J&J) can resolve tens of thousands of talcum powder cancer lawsuits through a…

🎁 March VIP Medical Record Review Offer – Get 300 Pages Free!         
Includes a Free Life Care Plan Report + 10% Off Future Reviews!

Only 15 Firms Accepted.