Skip to main content

Warranty Claims To Proceed In Valsartan MDL

Warranty Claims To Proceed In Valsartan MDL

Warranty Claims To Proceed In Valsartan MDL

Introduction

Last week, Judge Robert B. Kugler of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, overseeing the blood pressure drug valsartan MDL, rejected bids from the defendants over the dismissal of warranty claims.

According to the January 22 order, Judge Kugler upheld a breach of express warranty claims against the manufacturers. However, the judge tossed those claims against the wholesalers and pharmacies.

The opinion noted that the claims are viable against the manufacturers as they marketed their products as "valsartan or valsartan‐containing, and all three sets of defendants should face certain breach of implied warranty claims. The manufacturers include Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

The judge reasoned that for prescription drugs, which are identified and marketed as the generic equivalent to a branded pharmaceutical listed in the U.S. Food & Drug Administration's (FDA) Orange Book and then selling that generic equivalent when it contains a contaminant not included in the Orange Book listing constitutes a breach of express warranty.

The judge said that manufacturers, wholesalers, and pharmacies escaped claims for alleged violations of the Magnuson‐Moss Warranty Act because the plaintiffs failed to present to any defendant that the drug was contaminated. Breach of implied warranty claims against manufacturers, wholesalers, and pharmacies arising under certain state laws was also tossed because the plaintiffs failed to plead the requisite privity element.

A couple of weeks ago, Judge Kugler issued an order stating that the consumers involved in the MDL cannot bring claims under the laws of states in which they don't reside. The plaintiffs were given a deadline of today to amend their complaints if they brought the claims in states where they neither reside nor were injured.

Currently, at least 650 cases are pending in the litigation docket, each raising similar allegations that long-term exposure to recalled valsartan drug results in stomach cancer, liver cancer, esophageal cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and other injuries.

The lawsuits are consolidated under MDL No. 2875 in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, presided by Judge Robert B. Kugler, U.S.D.J and Hon. Joel Schneider, U.S.M.J.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Teen E-cigarette Use Hits 10-Year Low

Categories: E-Cigarette: JUUL

Federal officials report a significant decline in teen vaping rates in the U.S., with about half a million fewer middle and high school…

Baltimore, Walgreens Reach Opioid Settlement Totaling $402.5m

Categories: Opioids

The City of Baltimore has reached a settlement with Walgreens over its involvement in the opioid crisis, marking the…

Drug Distributors Reach $300M Opioid Settlement

Categories: Opioids

The three largest U.S. drug distributors—McKesson Corp, Cencora Inc, and Cardinal Health Inc—have agreed to pay $300 million to settle claims by health insurers and benefit plans over their role in fueling the U.S.…

Labor Day Litigation Bonanza!     
Free Trials + 15% Discount!